<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hidden Costs of Google Adwords &#8211; A Look at Keyword Matching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/2010/01/hidden-costs-of-google-adwords-a-look-at-keyword-matching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/2010/01/hidden-costs-of-google-adwords-a-look-at-keyword-matching/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:24:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chicago SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/2010/01/hidden-costs-of-google-adwords-a-look-at-keyword-matching/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/?p=561#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Good article, I notice in one of my accounts, which contains several campaigns and ad groups, that when I used exact matching instead of phrase matching that the ROI is worse!  How is this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, I notice in one of my accounts, which contains several campaigns and ad groups, that when I used exact matching instead of phrase matching that the ROI is worse!  How is this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/2010/01/hidden-costs-of-google-adwords-a-look-at-keyword-matching/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/?p=561#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Adding different combinations of keyword phrases will help boost the search volume. For example, more people may use the word &#039;attorney&#039; as opposed to &#039;lawyer&#039;. Or &#039;attornies&#039; or &#039;lawyers&#039;. And then using each of these variations with the other keywords, and their variations. PPC definitely requires a thorough keyword analysis. Also, don&#039;t forget misspellings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding different combinations of keyword phrases will help boost the search volume. For example, more people may use the word &#8216;attorney&#8217; as opposed to &#8216;lawyer&#8217;. Or &#8216;attornies&#8217; or &#8216;lawyers&#8217;. And then using each of these variations with the other keywords, and their variations. PPC definitely requires a thorough keyword analysis. Also, don&#8217;t forget misspellings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/2010/01/hidden-costs-of-google-adwords-a-look-at-keyword-matching/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clicksinternetmarketing.com/?p=561#comment-134</guid>
		<description>This is so helpful.  I didn&#039;t even know this was an option. Now, it seems my problem is that many of my keywords have low search volumes, but those are the terms that I want to show up for, the search categories that make sense for the firm.  blargh, I don&#039;t like Adwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so helpful.  I didn&#8217;t even know this was an option. Now, it seems my problem is that many of my keywords have low search volumes, but those are the terms that I want to show up for, the search categories that make sense for the firm.  blargh, I don&#8217;t like Adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

